Deep infection in the foot spaces must always be suspected whenever the patient does not respond to apparently appropriate therapy, when there are signs of systemic illness, or when signs of inflammation are present at some distance from the wound or ulcer

Antibiotic therapy

Gram-positive organisms including staphylococci and streptococci are usually responsible for superficial foot infections, whilst deeper infection maybe associated with more than one pathogen, including anaerobic and Gram-negative organisms (Figure 14.8). Treatment of deep foot infection will usually require surgical removal of infected tissue, and antibiotics alone are unlikely to be adequate. Identification of the responsible pathogen is important but will take time and this should not delay the commencement of antibiotic treatment. Ideally, the infected tissue itself should be cultured following debridement but by this time the patient will usually have started empirical therapy and swabs including actual pus if present

(rather than ulcer slough) should be sent for microbiological analysis at the first opportunity. Antibiotic therapy is adjusted according to culture results and may need to be continued until the ulcer has healed (Table 14.2 and Box 14.9).

Table 14.2 International Diabetes Federation: Suggested systemic antibiotic regimens for treating diabetic foot infections.

Severity of infection

Usual pathogen(s)

Potential regimens

Non-severe (oral for entire course) No complicating features GPC Recent antibiotic therapy GPC ± GNR Drug allergies

S-S pen; 1 G Ceph FQ, ß-L-ase Clindamycin; FQ; T/S

Severe (intravenous until stable, then switch to oral equivalent) No complicating features GPC2 ± GNR p-L-ase; 2/3 G Ceph

Recent antibiotic/ necrosis

GPC + GNR/ anaerobes

3/4 G Ceph; FQ + Clindamycin

Life-threatening (prolonged intravenous) MRSA unlikely GPC + GNR +


MRSA likely

Carbapenem; Clindamycin

Aminoglycoside Glycopeptide or linezolid + 3/4 G Ceph or FQ + metronidazole

Given at usual recommended doses for serious infections; modify for azotemia, etc., based on theoretical considerations and available clinical trials. A high local prevalence of methicillin resistance among staphylococci may require using vancomycin or other appropriate anti-staphylococcal agents active against these organisms.

1 G Ceph, first generation cephalosporins (e.g. cephalexin, cefazolin); 2/3/4 G Ceph, 2nd/3rd/4th generation cephalosporins (e.g. cefoxitin, ceftazidime, cefepime); p-L-ase, lactam- p lactamase-p inhibitor (e.g. amoxicillin/clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam); FQ, fluoroquinolones (e.g. ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin); GNR, gram-negative rod; GPC, gram-positive cocci; S-S pen, semi-synthetic (anti-staphylococcal) penicillin (e.g. flucloxacillin, oxacillin); T/S, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Carbapenem, e.g. imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, ertapenem; aminoglycoside, e.g. gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin; glycopeptides, e.g. vancomycin, teicoplanin.

Reproduced with permission from the IDF International Consensus of the Diabetic Foot, the Practical Guidelines (1999) and Supplements (2003).

Box 14.9 General principles of antimicrobial management

A. Prescribe for all clinically infected wounds immediately, but not for uninfected wounds.

B. Select the narrowest spectrum therapy possible for mild or moderate infections.

C. Choose initial therapy based on the commonest pathogens and known local antibiotic sensitivity data.

D. Adjust (broaden or constrain) empiric therapy based on the culture results and clinical response to the initial regimen

Conservative management Removal of callus

The finding of callus should lead to a referral to a chiropodist experienced in treating the feet of people with diabetes. In the absence of ulceration this can be done less urgently but the availability of this service is an essential component of the team management of diabetes.

Under the UK's National Health Service, podiatry and chiropody for diabetic feet (and other medical conditions) has become prioritised at the expense of general foot care in the older population without diabetes. This reflects the importance of professional treatment of early foot complications, including callus formation, which should never be 'self-managed'

Desloughing of ulcers using maggots

Removal of the slough and debris at the base of a diabetic foot ulcer may be achieved using maggots (Figure 14.9). This may be more effective than other means of desloughing and leaves the ulcer in a clean state ready to start healing.

Pressure relief casts

Ulcers often occur at the site of pressure, on the balls of the feet, the heel, or elsewhere on the sole. They are unlikely to heel if they continue to be exposed to this pressure. Scotchcast dressings with

Figure 14.9 Maggot therapy.

a hole over the ulcer are fitted to ensure that pressure is relieved in this area. It is essential that such casts are properly fitted to avoid new ulcers forming elsewhere on the foot. Bedrest may also be necessary to assist healing, but immobility carries its own risk.

Surgical intervention

Debridement and abscess drainage

Surgical debridement is often required to remove necrotic tissue. This in a sense is a 'conservative' measure in that it helps to reduce/ prevent the need for amputation. Necrotic tissue acts like a foreign body, delaying healing, harbouring infection and making extension of infection, osteomyelitis and systemic sepsis more likely. In addition to debridement, other surgical measures include drainage of foot abscesses (which may require access to the deep foot spaces) (Figure 14.10).

Osteomyelitis underlying infected, ulcerated skin is a common complication and should be actively excluded through plain radiography (Figure 14.11) in all cases of deep or resistant infection. It often requires surgical excision and its presence will influence the choice, route of administration and duration of antibiotic therapy.

Revascularisation and limb salvage

Revascularisation should preferably occur prior to the development of an ulcer in a patient with peripheral vascular disease (Figure 14.12), but often ulceration is the first symptom of a silent background process. Where ulceration is established, angioplasty, bypass or reconstruction to the major vessels may greatly improve the chances of healing. Revascularisation is required urgently in the case of the critically ischaemic foot, requiring inpatient management.


Amputation is indicated when conservative management fails, when persistent deep infection threatens systemic sepsis or progressive gangrene (Figure 14.13), or when rest pain is poorly controlled.

Figure 14.10 Probing a deep sinus beneath a neuropathic ulcer.
Figure 14.11 Radiograph of osteomyelitis.

When this is necessary, the limb must be assessed to determine the viability of proximal tissue. Adequate vascular supply is essential for healing, and if amputation is not extensive enough this healing may fail. Toe amputation is usually unsuccessful when there is significant ischaemia present, but may be an option in the purely neuropathic foot, or when revascularisation is successful (Figure 14.14). If so, conservation of the great toe may reduce the impact on limb function post-operatively. A dry, necrotic toe (Figure 14.15) may be left to 'auto-amputate' if infection is not an issue.

Figure 14.13 Extensive ulceration with infection and gangrene preceded this patient's below knee amputation.
Figure 14.14 Clean wound following amputation of the left little toe. Note the callosities and neuropathic ulceration on the sole.
Figure 14.12 Radiograph of atheromatous narrowing.
Figure 14.15 Dry necrosis of the distal right great toe.


The patient must also be assessed in a more holistic way to determine the options for rehabilitation. Some younger, fitter patients may manage with a prosthetic limb and regain walking mobility following limb amputation (Figure 14.16). Older, frailer or obese patients may not have this option, and are more likely to become wheelchair-dependent. These social consequences should be discussed with the patient and family if there is time before the decisions are made, even if amputation is inevitable. The psychological response to amputation is complex. For some, it has been compared to a bereavement. Involvement of the patient and carers in management decisions helps in this adjustment. Apart from the human costs of amputation and resulting disability, the health economic effects justify an intensive, proactive approach to ulcer management and follow-up, even in countries with less developed resources.

Figure 14.16 Successful healing following amputation of the third and fourth toes.


Amputation often signifies the end stage ofadvanced complications, and amputees not only have a high risk of future amputation in the other limb but also a high all-cause mortality rate in the year following the operation.

Further reading

International Diabetes Federation. International consensus on the diabetic foot, 2003.

Jeffcoate W, Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, et al. on behalf of the three systematic review working parties of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Unresolved issues in the management of ulcers of the foot in diabetes. Diabetic Med 2008;25:1380-9.

Supplements For Diabetics

Supplements For Diabetics

All you need is a proper diet of fresh fruits and vegetables and get plenty of exercise and you'll be fine. Ever heard those words from your doctor? If that's all heshe recommends then you're missing out an important ingredient for health that he's not telling you. Fact is that you can adhere to the strictest diet, watch everything you eat and get the exercise of amarathon runner and still come down with diabetic complications. Diet, exercise and standard drug treatments simply aren't enough to help keep your diabetes under control.

Get My Free Ebook

Post a comment